cVioletteRun.com


80’s 2.0

Web 2.0 LogosBrowsing around the internet for what seems like forever (StumbleUpon and digg are virtual crack), I’ve noticed something with the “Web 2.0″ design schemes… we’re going back to the 80’s.

Take color for example: look at most “web 2.0″ websites or logos. Go ahead, take a look. What do most of the colors have in common? They’re bright, they’re bold, they’re NEON. That’s right, the internet is now clad in DayGlo.

Not that the colors are all that bad. The internet has finally become a place where good design is more important than fancy stuff, and color is included. The colors are bright and eye-catching, but they’re not overpowering. Just a few years ago, everyone had a “look what I can do” attitude on the internet, and it produced some nauseating results. I’ll be happy if I never see another <blink> tag again.

DayGloTypography has become important on the web too. Most of the logos you see are focused around text, and text is what people see the most when they visit a website. So it has to look good. I’m glad the days of Comic Sans are almost over, although I still see it used (badly) from time to time. Both the 80s and Web 2.0 used a bunch of sans-serif fonts. The biggest difference I can see is that Web 2.0 likes to use rounded edges, soft shadows, and subtle reflections, while the 80’s used alot of sharp edges and radical angles. So I guess the 80’s are returning, but in a softer, gentler kind of way.

Web 2.0 has also had a couple of serious “stick-it-to-the-man” moments, most recently the digg story of the HD-DVD Hex Code. The 80’s were also a time of angst and rebellion, especially with the rising of the punk scene. I guess this isn’t the greatest of comparisons, but it’s a comparison nonetheless.

London 2012My final bit really has nothing to do with Web 2.0 at all, but it does have something to do with a comparison between 1980’s design and today’s design: the London 2012 Olympic logo. This is probably the worst design decision to happen to the Olympics (and Atlanta had Izzy, the blue… uh… thing.), but it totally screams “1980’s!” Further proof that we’re almost done wearing the bell-bottoms of the 60’s and 70’s and have moved on to copying the next decade.

So in short, we’re copying the 80’s. I can’t wait for Knight Rider to come back.

7 Responses to “80’s 2.0”

  1. SilverNY57 Says:

    Yes, but everything comes back into “style” (and, yes, I use that word with some sarcasm) about 20 years after it was originally big. The 80s are now “retro” (dear God, I’m retro…) - see the appearance of Hello Kitty and Care Bears in the stores so teeny boppers can wear them like they know who and what those characters are.

    I remember reading something about the reoccurence of names: 10 years after an era of the popularity of certain names, the names become “uncool”; 20 years, they become “old fashioned” - or retro, I guess; 50 years, they become “what were they thinking?”; 100 years, they become “romantic” and back in style. This is paraphrased horribly, but you get the idea.

    As you said, the good news is that the 80s have returned without the harsh edge - retro usually happens that way; see how the 70s returned in the 90s but without the overt and ugly use of white - it became off-white to soften the effect.

    Just my little ideas on the subject…

    Edit

  2. Beverley Knight Says:

    Hello webmaster…Man i love reading your blog, interesting posts ! it was a great Wednesday

  3. Customized Design Solutions Says:

    Customized Design Solutions

    I couldn’t understand some parts of this article, but it sounds interesting

  4. Beverley Knight Says:

    Hey!…Man i just love your blog, keep the cool posts comin..holy Sunday

  5. Beverley Knight Says:

    Hi there…Thanks for the nice read, keep up the interesting posts..what a nice Thursday

  6. Web 2.0 Websites Says:

    I gather always different opinions about web 2.0 and how to market with the different mindset of the ”new” Internet. Will social interaction and networking really make the web different? Thanks for your thoughts on this!

  7. Web 2.0 Design Says:

    Very Good.. Thanks Jason

Leave a Reply